Today's hottest deals

HP Engage One Essential All-in-One System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Engage One Essential All-in-One System  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 890D
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1440 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230404
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 13:31
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N6211
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.5% Very poor
Memory 22.8
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 35.6
16% 25.6 Pts
4-Core 36.2
8-Core 39.4
5% 37.8 Pts
64-Core 36.5
2% 36.5 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 890D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
1.48% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.48%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4256HBJD-00BH1 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NHAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 559 452 440 493 411 438 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 492
Write 406
Mixed 402
SusWrite 466
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 13
45% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 90.2
DQ Write 58.9
DQ Mixed 28.8
34% 59.3 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 258%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 8.7
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 276
14% 276 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 13 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14FF
Typical Engage One Essential All-in-One System Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Engage One Essential All-in-One System

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback