Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '22 at 09:10
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N6211
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.7% Below average
Memory 53
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 142
51% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 88.7
18% 121 Pts
64-Core 66.1
4% 66.1 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
2.31% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 2
2% 2.7 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.31%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 32GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 269
Write 125
Mixed 153
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 15.3
59% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 79.7
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 85.9
68% 93.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 64%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
23GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 10 9.9 10 11 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 98.4
Write 16.7
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 11
42% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
32% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905711-004.A00G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback