Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 27 '23 at 13:40
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8310
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 93.5
51% 77.5 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 310
30% 249 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Asus(1043 0471) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Huananzhi 512G 512GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1104A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 668 160 177 108 155 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 949
Write 690
Mixed 778
SusWrite 230
148% 662 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 24.5
119% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 334
246% 323 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 196%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
801GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 158 163 159 162 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 150
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 160
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
666GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 151 162 159 160 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 162
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 158
91% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 PC 8GB 1600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 10% 21 71 55 60 28.8" 1280 720 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback