Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-TF GAMING
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220606
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 01 '23 at 21:00
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 190
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 768
68% 577 Pts
64-Core 1,282
79% 1,282 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.3% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 135
Parallax 106
85% 115 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 98.6
Splatting 86.9
86% 108 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Huananzhi 512G 512GB
318GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R5312
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1290 1301 1294 1137 244 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 2,035
Write 1,331
Mixed 1,028
SusWrite 909
295% 1,326 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 41.6
136% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 476
332% 413 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 196%
Great: 196%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
239GB free
Firmware: A3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 95 95 95 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 123
Write 121
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 95.8
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0-CK0 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback