Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N6211 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		1-Core 44.5 2-Core 38.4 22% 41.5 Pts	4-Core 45.7 8-Core 66.2 7% 55.9 Pts	64-Core 61.6 4% 61.6 Pts
Poor: 15% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 78 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9079 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	1.99% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 4 Parallax 2.8 2% 3.1 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.99% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTS952T2 128GB 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02J0T4GB SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 104 111 104 105 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.1% Below average	Read 158 Write 161 Mixed 133 SusWrite 102 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 10 29% 9.33 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 102 100% 161 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS2GSH64V2E 1x16GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.51% Terrible	MC Read 1 MC Write 1.6 MC Mixed 2.1 4% 1.57 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 648 6% 648 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 5.51% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	19	3	60	27"	1280 720	AOC2701 27B1

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium J6426IntelBench 48%, 8 samples	2x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25 samples	2x

SSD
TS64GMTS952T2 64GBTranscendBench 57%, 2 samples	1x
TS256GMTS952T2 256GBTranscendBench 75%, 14 samples	1x

RAM
TS1GSH64V2B 1x8GBTranscendBench 44%, 11 samples	1x
TS2GSH64V2E 1x16GBTranscendBench 40%, 13 samples	1x