Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2215
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '18 at 20:16
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8 PRO-7600B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 63.9
2-Core 116
50% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 188
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7
HP(103C 2215) 960MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 8
Parallax 9.41
0% 5.81 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 7
Splatting 7.96
6% 7.08 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 77.04D77
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 61 53 47 78 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 114
Write 106
Mixed 77
SusWrite 62.9
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 Kingston HP698650-154-KEB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Poor
MC Read 13
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 11.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback