Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

Motherboard	Parallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory	0.1 GB free of 1.00001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20170228
Uptime	34.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '18 at 15:51
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 1,838 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	35% Below average	Memory 45 1-Core 52.1 2-Core 119 40% 72 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 183 20% 160 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 76%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HARDDISK 54GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: F.TJMXWM Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	36.6% Below average	Read 539 Write 183 Mixed 185 66% 303 MB/s	4K Read 6.37 4K Write 2.56 4K Mixed 1.8 13% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 225GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 1024, 32769, 32769, 32769, 32769, 32769, 32769, 32769 MB Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	21.5% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 0.3 7% 2.3 GB/s	Latency 180 22% 180 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 169%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,061x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325