Today's hottest deals

Leader Laptop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLeader Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardLeader Laptop
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '16 at 08:32
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 95
2-Core 159
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 251
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(1297 2050) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 5.77
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 7.19
5% 6.09 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 8
5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$55
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 494
Write 360
Mixed 426
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 18.6
105% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.5
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 14.7
23% 42.5 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 103%
Apacer AS710 128GB
92GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
153% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 176
Mixed 195
246% 195 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 10.8
1,315% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 37.3
DQ Mixed 9.31
1,667% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 153%
Great: 153%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GKH800SO51208-1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.8
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback