Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST E5 MR9A PRO MAX
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '24 at 21:33
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 190
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 745
65% 556 Pts
64-Core 1,298
80% 1,298 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Nvidia(10DE 134E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.8% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 108
Parallax 123
95% 116 fps
MRender 170
Gravity 107
Splatting 99.5
100% 126 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 2.3 21 60 15 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 451
Write 365
Mixed 251
SusWrite 51.2
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 15
64% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 56.8
DQ Mixed 37.3
41% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 55%
SSD 480GB 480GB
147GB free
Firmware: 227O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 212 202 214 210 210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 455
Write 222
Mixed 294
SusWrite 212
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 12.2
106% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 16.2
61% 132 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 88%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$77
670GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 123 122 122 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 94.9
Write 96
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 123
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (82nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
98% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 33.7
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 98%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 165 23.6" 1920 1017 SGT2556 DP
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback