Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive349% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
28 days ago, 24 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '24 at 00:14
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$105
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 171
2-Core 328
106% 197 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1,011
102% 827 Pts
64-Core 1,099
68% 1,099 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600-XT
Gigabyte(1458 2418) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.10.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 200
Parallax 274
134% 213 fps
MRender 246
Gravity 184
Splatting 226
179% 219 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$146
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2260 2285 2288 1910 1304 1469 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 2,434
Write 2,276
Mixed 1,863
SusWrite 1,919
477% 2,123 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 78.7
270% 97.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,283
DQ Write 1,015
DQ Mixed 1,128
850% 1,142 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 349%
Great: 435%
PNY USB 3.2.1 FD 64GB
32GB free, PID 1006
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 78 79 78 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 111
Write 2.2
Mixed 19
SusWrite 78.4
58% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.1
90% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$130
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.6% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 20.5
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 23
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.5" 1280 720 PLN2450 PLL2450MW
Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $534
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback