Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '24 at 19:57
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4000 APU-$171
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 71.1
38% 58.6 Pts
4-Core 72.9
8-Core 74.3
10% 73.6 Pts
64-Core 58.4
4% 58.4 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
ASRock(1849 9993) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3
Parallax 2.2
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X04c12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 126
Write 82.8
Mixed 110
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 4.6
31% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 50
DQ Write 73.7
DQ Mixed 86.9
59% 70.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 101%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
46GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.9
Write 9
Mixed 18.2
21% 19 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.3
94% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF Adata 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 41 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D2D C24F390
Typical FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback