Today's hottest deals

Xiaomi Redmi Book 16 2024 (Gen13 CPU)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemXiaomi Redmi Book 16 2024 (Gen13 CPU)  (all builds)
MotherboardXIAOMI TM2305
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240321
Uptime6 Days
Run DateSep 17 '24 at 13:20
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 45.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 227
68% 131 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 666
64% 530 Pts
64-Core 1,177
73% 1,177 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1D72 2305) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 26.1
Parallax 24.1
18% 23.9 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 31.8
Splatting 18.2
19% 24.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee XP2000F001T 1TB
892GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1223G0T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1709 1546 1479 1574 1472 1560 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
192% Outstanding
Read 891
Write 1,221
Mixed 872
SusWrite 1,557
258% 1,135 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 28.8
124% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 858
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 572
415% 556 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 192%
Great: 367%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G64D4ZV-026 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 7400 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
150% Outstanding
MC Read 55.3
MC Write 71.4
MC Mixed 57.2
175% 61.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 21.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 150%
Great: 168%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 120 16" 1280 720 BOE0C5D NE160QDM-NX3
Typical Redmi Book 16 2024 (Gen13 CPU) Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Xiaomi Redmi Book 16 2024 (Gen13 CPU)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $139
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback