PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds) |
Memory | 21 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120809 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 14 '24 at 22:30 |
Run Duration | 186 Seconds |
Run User | ARM-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 970-$1,141
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
72.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green M.2 2280 240GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 102 111 110 105 106 MB/s
|
45.8%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$75
100GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
|
54.5%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
94GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 101 95 99 98 101 MB/s
|
59.8%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD30NPRZ-00YRMT0 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 101 95 99 98 101 MB/s
|
60.5%
Good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
100GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 81 79 77 80 79 MB/s
|
63.9%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 79 77 80 80 MB/s
|
75.2%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 59 | 30 | 31.5" | 1280 720 | TSB0000 TOSHIBA-TV |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $84Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 626x |
Core i7 960Intel $217Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 306x |
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples | 90x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 123x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 93x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 82x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $364 |