Today's hottest deals

Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '24 at 22:30
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User ARM-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 970-$1,141
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 168
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 532
53% 433 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.5% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 38.9
Parallax 37.1
29% 37.2 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 26.4
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green M.2 2280 240GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 102 111 110 105 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.8% Average
Read 326
Write 175
Mixed 164
SusWrite 100
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 18.8
65% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 94
DQ Mixed 10
44% 102 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$75
100GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 112
Write 116
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 78.1
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
94GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 101 95 99 98 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 110
Write 82.6
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 97.7
56% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 107%
WD WD30NPRZ-00YRMT0 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 101 95 99 98 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 113
Write 93.8
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 97.7
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 71%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
100GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 81 79 77 80 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 144
Write 73.2
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 78.8
59% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 79 77 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 183
Write 137
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 79.2
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.6% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 17.2
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.7
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 30 31.5" 1280 720 TSB0000 TOSHIBA-TV
Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback