Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH16-72

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive570% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH16-72  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL eTron_RTX
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '24 at 10:26
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 77.7
1-Core 197
2-Core 408
117% 228 Pts
4-Core 685
8-Core 1,064
108% 875 Pts
64-Core 1,872
116% 1,872 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 103%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 172D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.5608
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32% Below average
Lighting 19
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 55.2
16% 48.7 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 61
64% 81.3 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 32%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS001TEJ9X125N 1TB
713GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4171 4198 4213 2131 1391 1370 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
570% Outstanding
Read 4,939
Write 4,152
Mixed 2,812
SusWrite 2,912
829% 3,704 MB/s
4K Read 80.7
4K Write 293
4K Mixed 128
442% 167 MB/s
DQ Read 1,556
DQ Write 1,043
DQ Mixed 1,221
932% 1,273 MB/s
Poor: 295%
This bench: 570%
Great: 581%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA095N Apacer D22.3528WM.001 32GB
5600, 5600 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
156% Outstanding
MC Read 65.9
MC Write 58.6
MC Mixed 59.1
175% 61.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 26.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 150%
This bench: 156%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 13 240 16" 1707 996 CMN162F
Typical Predator PH16-72 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator PH16-72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback