Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMANCER
MotherboardMANCER A520MDX
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '24 at 22:59
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 74.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 830
86% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,005
62% 1,005 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 26.5
15% 21.4 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 19.5
15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TGT-SLST-240 240GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 68 53 44 43 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 472
Write 364
Mixed 352
SusWrite 56.4
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 13.4
97% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 7.4
59% 136 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59%
Great: 100%
MCR-RPRS-480 480GB
197GB free
Firmware: HP3105A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 350 239 55 57 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 455
Write 413
Mixed 316
SusWrite 194
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 12
96% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 14.9
72% 157 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 23.1
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 19.6
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 24 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2WG3-
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback