Today's hottest deals

Asrock A520M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 15 '24 at 05:28
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$159
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 72
1-Core 162
2-Core 322
97% 185 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 977
98% 800 Pts
64-Core 1,404
87% 1,404 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 94%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 30.3
20% 24.5 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 0.5
10% 13 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 17 59 75 55 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 288
Write 112
Mixed 220
SusWrite 68.9
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 24.9
124% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 134
128% 197 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 85%
TGT-SLST-240 240GB
80GB free
Firmware: S1022B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 408 410 411 413 415 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 421
Mixed 381
SusWrite 412
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 28.2
148% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 40.3
89% 178 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.1% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 22.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27.6" 1280 720 SAM0C3C SAMSUNG
Typical A520M-HVS Builds (Compare 585 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback