Today's hottest deals

Intel X99H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel X99
MotherboardIntel X99H  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231027
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 29 '24 at 14:31
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 181
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 678
60% 508 Pts
64-Core 1,183
73% 1,183 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.9% Average
Lighting 50.6
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 71.8
41% 60.7 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 58.3
Splatting 44.5
43% 54.1 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H230915a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 412 417 416 415 398 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 451
Mixed 409
SusWrite 416
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 36
131% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 192
152% 206 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 93%
Great: 98%
Seagate ST250DM001 HD253GJ 250GB
198GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 135 136 136 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 138
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 136
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0-YK0 1x16GB
1 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 75 0.7" 1280 720 VIEE003 EGM22F100
Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback