Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82FG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82FG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240329
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 00:53
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 147
2-Core 245
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 426
47% 372 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3F88) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 19.3
19% 20.9 fps
MRender 18
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 15.7
15% 19.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ512HALU-000L2 512GB
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL2QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 775 627 589 304 305 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 920
Write 979
Mixed 850
SusWrite 483
182% 808 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 55.9
189% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 847
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 549
410% 561 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 150%
Great: 202%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 495GB
320GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 80 68 80 81 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 213
Write 33.4
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 74.8
98% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.2
78% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
64.9% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 19.8
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 14.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 0R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 16% 25 211 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE08E2
Typical 82FG Builds (Compare 2,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82FG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback