Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83AS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemLenovo 83AS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 20:44
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 66.5
1-Core 174
2-Core 343
100% 195 Pts
4-Core 665
8-Core 1,291
116% 978 Pts
64-Core 1,475
91% 1,475 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 680M
Legend(17AA 3C3C) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 50.3
Parallax 77.8
34% 56.8 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 44.6
Splatting 25.8
26% 32.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPEYJ1T24MKN2QWY 1TB
898GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2L06A1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,349
Write 1,895
Mixed 1288
339% 1,510 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 26.7
163% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1014
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 753
538% 707 MB/s
Poor: 174% Great: 387%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 39.6
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 31.5
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 16" 1280 720 BOE0AC1
Typical 83AS Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 83AS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback