Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics95.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA617NS
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '24 at 20:18
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 50.8
1-Core 86
2-Core 123
50% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 489
46% 383 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600S
Asus(1043 231D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.7% Outstanding
Lighting 101
Reflection 130
Parallax 155
82% 129 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 116
Splatting 157
122% 149 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,305
Write 1,050
Mixed 1041
252% 1,132 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 26.8
120% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 403
276% 350 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 39.3
114% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 29.5
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 106%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 49 60 16" 1280 720 BOE0B33 NE160WUM-NX2
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback