Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-ef2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 15-ef2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887A
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230802
Uptime10.4 Days
Run DateJul 25 '24 at 01:47
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 138
56% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 565
57% 461 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 887A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.19.10.04
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
8.48% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 16.7
7% 13.1 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 15.8
12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.48%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7601Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 525 476 498 641 646 658 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 838
Write 746
Mixed 715
SusWrite 574
161% 718 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 30.5
102% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 432
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 311
219% 286 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 113%
Great: 421%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S8MR-8 Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.6% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1538
Typical Laptop 15-ef2xxx Builds (Compare 617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-ef2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback