Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FB_K5N0CV10X82822A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FB_K5N0CV10X82822A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X712FB
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200615
Uptime13 Days
Run DateJul 24 '24 at 15:17
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 198
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 415
46% 362 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1E7E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.56% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.53 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 7
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.56%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 181 123 154 152 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 440
Write 266
Mixed 232
SusWrite 155
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 14.9
67% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 182
150% 216 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
775GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 121 128 131 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 137
Write 135
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 124
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.5
211% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FR 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.2% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 20.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 21.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 17.3" 1280 720 BOE084E
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FB_K5N0CV10X82822A Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FB_K5N0CV10X82822A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback