Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac18,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac18,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-4B682C642B45593E
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240314
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJul 22 '24 at 06:23
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7360U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 67
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 118
53% 87.5 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 226
29% 220 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Apple(106B 017E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
8.62% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 10.8
9% 10.1 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 11
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.62%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD HTS541010A9E632 1TB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0AB5N0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 28 38 34 40 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 22.8
Write 38.6
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 29
20% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D413835315336414652364E2D554820202020 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 9.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 0P 3R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 13% 102 126 30 60 21.5" 1280 720 APPA012 iMac
Typical iMac18,1 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac18,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback