Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac19,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac19,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-63001698E7A34814
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display4096 x 2304 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 04:14
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 715
75% 600 Pts
64-Core 727
45% 727 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Apple(106B 0197) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1004 MHz, MLim: 1470 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 32.7
19% 26.2 fps
MRender 22.4
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 17.1
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD HTS541010A9E632 1TB
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0AB5N0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 58 53 59 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 7.8
Write 61
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 55.4
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E3 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
66.9% Good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 19.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 21.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac19,2 Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Apple iMac19,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback