Today's hottest deals

Asus ZenBook UX325JA_UX325JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ZenBook UX325JA_UX325JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX325JA
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220117
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateJul 22 '24 at 00:56
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 53.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
66% 123 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 485
53% 420 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G4
Asus(1043 1122) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9955
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7
5% 7.47 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 11.7
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$37
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 583 614 524 461 259 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 1,068
Write 693
Mixed 654
SusWrite 426
158% 710 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 47.3
161% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 346
229% 276 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 130%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AA-MGCL 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 27.7
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 21.1
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 13.3" 1280 720 SDC4158
Typical ZenBook UX325JA_UX325JA Builds (Compare 164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook UX325JA_UX325JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback