Today's hottest deals

Asus ZenBook UX363JA_UX363JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 73% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus ZenBook UX363JA_UX363JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX363JA
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210127
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 18 '22 at 09:36
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 73%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 200
68% 124 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 522
53% 431 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G4
Asus(1043 11A2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
8.39% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 8.9
7% 9.17 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 16.2
12% 14.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.39%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 81 227 433 130 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 920
Write 756
Mixed 585
SusWrite 187
136% 612 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 19.1
64% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 415
DQ Write 83.8
DQ Mixed 116
120% 205 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AA-MGCL 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
114% Outstanding
MC Read 46.1
MC Write 47.4
MC Mixed 37
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 40.5
SC Mixed 27.5
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZenBook UX363JA_UX363JA Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook UX363JA_UX363JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback