PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180305 |
Uptime | 21.3 Days |
Run Date | Jul 21 '24 at 19:47 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | MAR-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
62.9%
Good
|
59% 98.7 Pts
|
41% 334 Pts
|
31% 500 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia Quadro K4000
HP(103C 079C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 474.64
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
11% 16.5 fps
|
14% 18.1 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 130 125 130 128 121 MB/s
|
48.7%
Average
|
37% 166 MB/s
|
79% 28.5 MB/s
|
108% 155 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$42
163GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 115 119 117 117 118 MB/s
|
65.4%
Good
|
73% 99.5 MB/s
|
159% 1.07 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown ID:80 CE M378B1G73QH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B1G73DB0-CK0 50GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 34816 MB
|
18.3%
Very poor
|
15% 5.13 GB/s
|
19% 6.63 GB/s
|
48% 83 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 27 | 193 | 58 | 60 | 22" | 1680 1050 | HWP2848 LA2205 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 579x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 547x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 498x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 282x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 157x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 139x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 139x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $44Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 74x |
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 66x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $255 |