Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateJul 21 '24 at 05:35
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$152
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 95.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 265
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 754
73% 600 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2802 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 193
Parallax 201
146% 191 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 188
Splatting 129
122% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1114 368 251 81 40 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,688
Write 2,064
Mixed 1,819
SusWrite 315
331% 1,472 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 75.1
246% 85.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,030
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 903
675% 902 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 204%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
51GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,254
Write 7,066
Mixed 7,816
1,790% 8,046 MB/s
4K Read 513
4K Write 266
4K Mixed 324
1,333% 368 MB/s
DQ Read 1,316
DQ Write 752
DQ Mixed 830
672% 966 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Gigastone SS6200-256GB 256GB
174GB free
Firmware: N0724B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 336 337 338 338 338 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 334
Mixed 322
SusWrite 337
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 45.7
155% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 192
174% 263 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB
97GB free
Firmware: CC98
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 105 104 106 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 60.1
Write 53.2
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 105
44% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 74%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$125
191GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 110 137 135 118 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 130
71% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$80
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 165 164 163 163 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 135
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 162
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT4G4D30AETA.K8FE 859B BLT4G4D30AETA.K8FE 859B BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 859B BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 24GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.8% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 24.6
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 54.2
74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 49" 1280 720 SNY8C03 SONY TV *06
Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,959 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback