Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory47 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 19 '24 at 07:12
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 246
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 783
73% 611 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$280
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 174
Parallax 158
141% 168 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 135
Splatting 118
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 126%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-CE256-11 SATA 256GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C18110B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 80 93 81 84 83 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 336
Write 298
Mixed 265
SusWrite 95.3
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 5.4
18% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 108%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
217GB free
Firmware: T0214B0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 732 180 59 814 239 257 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 957
Write 806
Mixed 662
SusWrite 380
157% 701 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 7.5
31% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 887
DQ Write 747
DQ Mixed 490
456% 708 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 107%
Great: 310%
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
238GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 295 213 282 280 277 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 332
Write 308
Mixed 275
SusWrite 289
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 5.3
18% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 Corsair CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 Corsair CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 64GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 33.5
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 30.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 165 27" 1280 720 SAM72FC LS27CG51x
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $786
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback