Today's hottest deals

Samsung 750XFG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 750XFG  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP750XFG-KB3SE
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240221
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 17 '24 at 02:32
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i3-1315U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 29.1
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 253
57% 121 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 587
63% 502 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1D3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 11.7
11% 14 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 0.6
8% 11.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4256HBJD-00B 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 1057 1141 1195 1016 317 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,141
Write 1,100
Mixed 948
SusWrite 920
231% 1,027 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 75
246% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 685
DQ Mixed 801
610% 830 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 216%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AB-MGCL 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 54.9
MC Mixed 43.9
129% 45.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 17.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 5 60 15.5" 1280 720 KDB0526
Typical 750XFG Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 750XFG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback