Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3504VA_K3504VAB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3504VA_K3504VAB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K3504VA
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231212
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJul 17 '24 at 02:18
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i3-1315U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 27.3
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 197
50% 102 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 474
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1793) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 15.5
11% 15.2 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 14.4
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 707
Write 922
Mixed 706
175% 778 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 12.1
80% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 425
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 310
231% 312 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 11.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 196
20% 196 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3504VA_K3504VAB Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3504VA_K3504VAB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback