Today's hottest deals

Oegstone CS-B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemOegstone CS-B  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CS-B
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '24 at 20:33
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 155
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 315
40% 306 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E249) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
30.3% Below average
Lighting 41
Reflection 33.8
Parallax 51.6
33% 42.1 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 23.4
24% 30.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 64GB SSD 64GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 180 190 186 191 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 395
Write 181
Mixed 154
SusWrite 184
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 8
75% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 67.1
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 11.2
40% 83.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-052.A00LF 1315 CT51264BD160B.C16F 99U5402-052.A00LF 1310 B473B841 16GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 9.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 23" 1280 720 HWP327A HP E232
Typical CS-B Builds (Compare 244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone CS-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback