Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A87TD/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD/USB3  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime19.2 Days
Run DateJul 08 '24 at 03:03
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 73
1-Core 43.1
2-Core 85.2
44% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 163
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Asus(1043 8365) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 8.2
7% 9.53 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 8.5
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 198 240 239 239 236 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 332
Write 279
Mixed 265
SusWrite 236
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 25.2
90% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 35
DQ Write 92.6
DQ Mixed 47
41% 58.2 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$150
1TB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 114 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63% Good
Read 106
Write 94.4
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 113
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$80
190GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 101
Write 79.9
Mixed 60
SusWrite 109
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-096.A01LF 9905403-096.A01LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.9% Poor
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 5 60 72.3" 1920 1017 AMZ0000 FireTV
Typical M4A87TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback