Today's hottest deals

Asrock A55M-DGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A55M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJul 04 '24 at 15:13
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 87
41% 65.3 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 158
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
MSI(1462 3104) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 16.4
14% 16.9 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 15.3
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 29 27 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
635GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 136 140 138 132 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 156
Write 135
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 135
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AE34G1339U1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.4% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.5
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.5
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 1R 3G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 13% 91 302 205 60 21.5" 1920 1017 ACR0319 Acer H226HQL
Typical A55M-DGS Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A55M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback