Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121012
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 21:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 179
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 505
52% 422 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 23.8
18% 21.4 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 17.6
18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 366 370 371 368 371 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 363
Write 350
Mixed 297
SusWrite 365
78% 344 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 29.8
100% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 75.3
DQ Mixed 41
35% 49.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
707GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 194 196 199 198 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 149
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 196
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AE34G1339U1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.4% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 1,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback