Asus ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MJ_Q533MJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MJ_Q533MJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N6506MJ
Memory5.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231221
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJul 01 '24 at 02:51
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 47.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 241
70% 136 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 747
70% 582 Pts
64-Core 1,143
71% 1,143 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
Asus(1043 3698) 1GB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5008
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 36.6
9% 20.8 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 33.1
23% 27 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1102 1TB
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74114000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 748 578 700 716 1061 1026 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 1,161
Write 914
Mixed 901
SusWrite 805
212% 945 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 7.9
60% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 105
109% 182 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 122%
Great: 526%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 92 90 92 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
43% Average
Read 89.2
Write 80.9
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 90.4
107% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H5CG46AGBDX Samsung M425R1GB4PB0-CWMOD 16GB
5600, 5600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 53.1
MC Write 47.9
MC Mixed 50.2
144% 50.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 26.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 128%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 15 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4161
Typical ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MJ_Q533MJ Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: Asus ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MJ_Q533MJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback