Today's hottest deals

Transource MIR-PDT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTransource MIR-PDT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H110M-R
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '24 at 00:53
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$165
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 60.7
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 179
62% 112 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 545
54% 439 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.47% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 5
4% 4.63 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 8.5
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VK000240GWCNP 240GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4IDVHPG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 261 280 280 264 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 196
Write 306
Mixed 210
SusWrite 275
56% 246 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 23.2
81% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 184
144% 199 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Silicon-Power 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.6% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 4.8
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 100 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0B25 KC242Y
Typical MIR-PDT Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Transource MIR-PDT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $299Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback