Lenovo 83EG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83EG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '24 at 05:17
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840H
FP7r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 55.5
1-Core 168
2-Core 343
96% 189 Pts
4-Core 677
8-Core 1,305
118% 991 Pts
64-Core 1,486
92% 1,486 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Legend(17AA 3D14) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.76.07
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52% Above average
Lighting 62.2
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 82
51% 52 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 83
Splatting 90.7
55% 62.2 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJYJ512MKN1QWY 512GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2L06A1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,916
Write 2,428
Mixed 1,822
461% 2,055 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 32.9
199% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 654
DQ Mixed 679
531% 736 MB/s
Poor: 176% Great: 326%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3PB0-CWMOL 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.7% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 25.4
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 22.8
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUO7EAD
Typical 83EG Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 83EG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback