Lenovo 82XT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82XT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230616
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 27 '23 at 05:48
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840H
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 59.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 268
74% 144 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 892
83% 692 Pts
64-Core 1,379
85% 1,379 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Legend(17AA 3C93) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.03.28
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
48.8% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 90.2
46% 55.9 fps
MRender 21
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 93.9
55% 62.9 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJYJ512MKN1QWY 512GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0L06A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1776 1766 1328 259 284 320 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,240
Write 1,651
Mixed 1,174
SusWrite 955
284% 1,255 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 29.5
129% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 898
DQ Write 413
DQ Mixed 681
498% 664 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 176%
Great: 326%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 29.3
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 27.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 6 172 57 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE0A2D
Typical 82XT Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

System: Lenovo 82XT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback