Today's hottest deals

Asus Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 420%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 651%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics393% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive499% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE  (all builds)
Memory54.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '24 at 17:45
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX 24-Cores
SP6, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 80.2
1-Core 205
2-Core 396
118% 227 Pts
4-Core 769
8-Core 1,489
134% 1,129 Pts
64-Core 5,335
330% 5,335 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 112%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Nvidia(10DE 165B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
393% Outstanding
Lighting 633
Reflection 575
Parallax 724
516% 644 fps
MRender 532
Gravity 564
Splatting 304
365% 466 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 393%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$140
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4075 4081 4096 4119 4128 2972 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
499% Outstanding
Read 2,939
Write 4,208
Mixed 3,225
SusWrite 3,912
810% 3,571 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 83
265% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,544
DQ Write 1,144
DQ Mixed 1,284
976% 1,324 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 499%
Great: 587%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
268GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2111 296 262 301 349 362 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,756
Write 2,300
Mixed 1,900
SusWrite 614
370% 1,643 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 71.2
230% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,593
DQ Write 1,166
DQ Mixed 1,317
1,001% 1,359 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 241%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
275GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2146 339 261 284 311 338 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,737
Write 2,207
Mixed 1,874
SusWrite 613
362% 1,608 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 68.1
220% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1584
DQ Write 1153
DQ Mixed 1,304
992% 1,347 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 236%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560R32-16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
461% Outstanding
MC Read 268
MC Write 137
MC Mixed 165
543% 190 GB/s
SC Read 45.6
SC Write 75.6
SC Mixed 63
175% 61.4 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 210%
This bench: 461%
Great: 461%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 240 26.7" 1280 720 GSM5C34 LG ULTRAGEAR+
Typical Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 386%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 510%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,942
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback