Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83E1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 83E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1600 x 2560 - 32 Bit couleurs, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '24 at 21:15
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 61.6
1-Core 182
2-Core 326
99% 190 Pts
4-Core 608
8-Core 923
95% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,122
70% 1,122 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
Legend(17AA 3812) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31% Below average
Lighting 32
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 53.4
26% 38.1 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 68.2
41% 46.7 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31%
Great: 50%
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Gigabyte(1458 37B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 168
Parallax 196
143% 180 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 151
Splatting 129
123% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPMQD-512G-1101 512GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73116001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,359
Write 3112
Mixed 2,414
659% 2,962 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 63.6
220% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 1,615
DQ Write 1314
DQ Mixed 1,189
965% 1,373 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 425%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66BK7HX096 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 47.4
MC Write 56.3
MC Mixed 46.2
143% 50 GB/s
SC Read 43.1
SC Write 62.2
SC Mixed 54.1
152% 53.1 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 140%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 31.5" 2560 1369 LEN0001 Go Display
Typical 83E1 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 83E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback