Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7E25)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 194%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive685% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E25
MotherboardMSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7E25)  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '24 at 11:52
Run Duration364 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K-$362
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 231
2-Core 458
131% 256 Pts
4-Core 921
8-Core 1,780
160% 1,351 Pts
64-Core 3,867
239% 3,867 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$299
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 108
Parallax 151
131% 140 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 127
Splatting 103
109% 138 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 119%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000T705SSD5 1TB
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7312 4094 1361 1417 1360 1357 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
685% Outstanding
Read 7,424
Write 7,495
Mixed 4,089
SusWrite 2817
1,220% 5,456 MB/s
4K Read 91.6
4K Write 276
4K Mixed 134
457% 167 MB/s
DQ Read 1,750
DQ Write 1,584
DQ Mixed 1,730
1,280% 1,688 MB/s
Poor: 351%
This bench: 685%
Great: 685%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$100
770GB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4205 4228 3311 1585 1659 1662 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
465% Outstanding
Read 2,049
Write 4,304
Mixed 3,349
SusWrite 2,775
711% 3,119 MB/s
4K Read 86.3
4K Write 254
4K Mixed 129
431% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 1,852
DQ Write 1,719
DQ Mixed 1,856
1,374% 1,809 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 465%
Great: 507%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$100
848GB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4275 4280 3061 1679 1651 1626 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
500% Outstanding
Read 2,992
Write 4,192
Mixed 3,363
SusWrite 2762
753% 3,327 MB/s
4K Read 85.6
4K Write 253
4K Mixed 129
429% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 1,821
DQ Write 1,697
DQ Mixed 1,816
1,347% 1,778 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 500%
Great: 507%
Lexar JumpDrive S23 USB 3.0 16GB-$17
7GB free, PID a833
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 66.8
Write 18.9
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 17.4
36% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.1
64% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 27%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 126GB
65GB free, PID 0809
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 50 27 23 20 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
Read 250
Write 62.9
Mixed 107
SusWrite 34.2
123% 114 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 13.6
1,153% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 21.6
DQ Mixed 13.9
1,276% 18 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-6400 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 65.7
MC Write 62.9
MC Mixed 59.3
179% 62.6 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 53.5
SC Mixed 26.1
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 133%
This bench: 160%
Great: 214%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 0P 5R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 9% 47 208 43 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7080 LC32G5xT
History: Score 8: 0P 0R 2G 2B | Score 43: 0P 5R 6G 0B
Typical MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7E25) Builds (Compare 797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 459%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 609%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7E25)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $2,271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback