Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-DS2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161116
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 23 '24 at 20:17
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$35
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 166
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 283
38% 282 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 374A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 76.3
Parallax 72.5
60% 74.3 fps
MRender 73.1
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 65.4
57% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$79
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 125 134 112 127 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 160
Write 136
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 121
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 107%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
214GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 109 109 107 105 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 200
Write 164
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 107
178% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 04CB 24GB
2667, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.6% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 12.3
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 10.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 13 60 21.7" 1920 1017 KOA0030 TV_MONITOR
Typical GA-H110M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 2,478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback