Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M S2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201116
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 22 '24 at 18:43
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Memory 43.9
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 91.5
43% 71.3 Pts
4-Core 83.1
8-Core 163
15% 123 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.5% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 58.2
51% 59.9 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 57.9
50% 60.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS120G2G0A- 120GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 250
Write 186
Mixed 93.2
130% 177 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 6.5
1,024% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 153%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16
13GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 79 68 82 74 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 45.7
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 75
41% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39%
Great: 60%
Adata HD710 PRO 1TB
190GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 98 103 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 122
Write 123
Mixed 56
SusWrite 101
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
191% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS82666 04EF Team-Elite-2400 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.3% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 10.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 22" 1680 1027 DELF043 DELL P2213
Typical GA-H310M S2 Builds (Compare 559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback