Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17Q2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics9.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive662% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Titan GT77HX 13VI
MotherboardMSI MS-17Q2  (all builds)
Memory112.6 GB free of 128 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateApr 09 '24 at 17:05
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13980HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 71.5
1-Core 222
2-Core 439
124% 244 Pts
4-Core 830
8-Core 1,531
141% 1,180 Pts
64-Core 3,200
198% 3,200 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 114%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 13C4) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
9.49% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 12.2
9% 13.2 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 11.8
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5130 5185 5123 5205 5179 4880 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
662% Outstanding
Read 5,076
Write 5,374
Mixed 3,351
SusWrite 5,117
1,066% 4,729 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 90.7
290% 99.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,247
DQ Write 1272
DQ Mixed 1,198
918% 1,239 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 662%
Great: 672%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG88AGBSA092N 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
114% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 41.2
124% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 25.3
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 114%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 17.2" 1280 720 AUO41A2
Typical MS-17Q2 Builds (Compare 174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 236%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 290%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17Q2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback