Today's hottest deals

HP 810-170st

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemHP 810-170st  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACE
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151104
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 06 '23 at 14:56
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 208
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 612
63% 506 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.4% Very good
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 116
Parallax 103
80% 106 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 98.2
Splatting 85
75% 92.8 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 732 768 783 802 802 804 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,080
Write 793
Mixed 631
SusWrite 782
184% 821 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 37.3
122% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 411
DQ Write 416
DQ Mixed 387
298% 405 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 147%
Great: 672%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 37.4
111% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-170st Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: HP 810-170st

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $389
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback