Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-158N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Bravo 15 C7VF
MotherboardMSI MS-158N  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '24 at 16:43
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 70.5
1-Core 171
2-Core 337
100% 193 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 974
97% 793 Pts
64-Core 1,310
81% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
MSI(1462 13DD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.01.54
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.6% Poor
Lighting 38
Reflection 46.4
Parallax 69.9
31% 51.4 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 25.9
24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-AI 512GB
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,310
Write 2,870
Mixed 1,871
457% 2,017 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 74.4
245% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 1,206
DQ Write 505
DQ Mixed 864
637% 858 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 346%
WD Elements 2620 2TB
1TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 107
Write 97.3
Mixed 68.4
112% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
169% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
114% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 47.6
MC Mixed 38.4
121% 42.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 48
SC Mixed 26
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 114%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 0P 0R 4G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 13% 46 214 55 144 15.5" 1536 864 CMN1521
Typical MS-158N Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MS-158N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback