Today's hottest deals

Samsung 950QED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 950QED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP950QED-KB1US
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230203
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMar 07 '24 at 18:58
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 39.8
1-Core 155
2-Core 294
82% 163 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 792
86% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,083
67% 1,083 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1AC) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3616
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 21.3
15% 21 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 18.4
18% 21.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-8D1024 1TB
686GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EV22002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 647 595 606 641 612 615 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 1021
Write 507
Mixed 667
SusWrite 619
157% 704 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 17.5
88% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 289
189% 227 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 113%
Great: 306%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 30.7
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1920 1009 SDC4159
Typical 950QED Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 950QED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback