PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock P55 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110118 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 01 '24 at 00:21 |
Run Duration | 267 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
69.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 136 153 154 154 154 MB/s
|
71.9%
Very good
|
|||
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
196GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 125 135 134 135 135 MB/s
|
61%
Good
|
|||
WDC WD20 EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
608GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 35 36 36 37 35 MB/s
|
22.3%
Poor
|
|||
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
26GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 131 144 146 150 151 MB/s
|
70.8%
Very good
|
|||
62%
Good
|
||||
39.1%
Below average
|
||||
ASMT 2115 2TB
911GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 36 37 36 36 MB/s
|
37.4%
Below average
|
|||
SPCC Sol id State Disk 1TB
393GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 35 36 34 36 37 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
42.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10% | 30% | 20 | 217 | 60 | 60 | 24.1" | 1280 720 | NEC68D5 EA244WMi |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 760Intel $90Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 7x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 5x |
Core i5-750Intel $60Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 3x |
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples | 3x |
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $385 |