Today's hottest deals

Asrock P55 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock P55 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110118
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '24 at 00:21
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 168
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 348
40% 309 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.9% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 37.7
30% 38.1 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 27.3
28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 136 153 154 154 154 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.9% Very good
Read 263
Write 252
Mixed 240
SusWrite 145
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 42.7
140% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 198
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 124%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
196GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 125 135 134 135 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61% Good
Read 228
Write 164
Mixed 177
SusWrite 129
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 34.1
116% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 150
122% 171 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61%
Great: 100%
WDC WD20 EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
608GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 35 36 36 37 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 178
Write 65.4
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 34.9
19% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 1.1
48% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 2
3% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 47%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
26GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 131 144 146 150 151 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.8% Very good
Read 227
Write 250
Mixed 234
SusWrite 140
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 44.1
143% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 106
103% 162 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
681GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 63 68 67 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62% Good
Read 150
Write 109
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 65.1
74% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
287GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 34 33 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 103
Write 93.1
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 32.5
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 69%
ASMT 2115 2TB
911GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 36 37 36 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 168
Write 86.3
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 35.1
107% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 74%
SPCC Sol id State Disk 1TB
393GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 35 36 34 36 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
Read 129
Write 114
Mixed 114
SusWrite 34.4
127% 98 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 17.8
1,494% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16.2
DQ Write 25.5
DQ Mixed 19
1,574% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 13
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 0R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 30% 20 217 60 60 24.1" 1280 720 NEC68D5 EA244WMi
Typical P55 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock P55 Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback