Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8AA6
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJan 04 '24 at 19:27
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 194
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 471
48% 391 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8AA6) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 17.7
12% 17.1 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 14.3
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GEJ9X113N 256GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51770C30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 514 874 724 1230 1222 502 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 1,058
Write 1,332
Mixed 725
SusWrite 844
223% 990 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 20.6
92% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 517
DQ Write 27.2
DQ Mixed 50.2
92% 198 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 133%
Great: 304%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.6% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 12
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 14" 1280 720 AUO559C
Typical EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback